↓ Skip to main content

Social Stigma and Knowledge of Tuberculosis and HIV among Patients with Both Diseases in Thailand

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social Stigma and Knowledge of Tuberculosis and HIV among Patients with Both Diseases in Thailand
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0006360
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sirinapha X. Jittimanee, Sriprapa Nateniyom, Wanitchaya Kittikraisak, Channawong Burapat, Somsak Akksilp, Nopphanath Chumpathat, Chawin Sirinak, Wanchai Sattayawuthipong, Jay K. Varma

Abstract

Disease-related stigma and knowledge are believed to be associated with patients' willingness to seek treatment and adherence to treatment. HIV-associated tuberculosis (TB) presents unique challenges, because TB and HIV are both medically complex and stigmatizing diseases. In Thailand, we assessed knowledge and beliefs about these diseases among HIV-infected TB patients. We prospectively interviewed and examined HIV-infected TB patients from three provinces and one national referral hospital in Thailand from 2005-2006. At the beginning of TB treatment, we asked patients standardized questions about TB stigma, TB knowledge, and HIV knowledge. Responses were grouped into scores; scores equal to or greater than the median score of study population were considered high. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with scores. Of 769 patients enrolled, 500 (65%) reported high TB stigma, 177 (23%) low TB knowledge, and 379 (49%) low HIV knowledge. Patients reporting high TB stigma were more likely to have taken antibiotics before TB treatment, to have first visited a traditional healer or private provider, to not know that monogamy can reduce the risk of acquiring HIV infection, and to have been hospitalized at enrollment. Patients with low TB knowledge were more likely to have severe TB disease, to be hospitalized at enrollment, to be treated at the national infectious diseases referral hospital, and to have low HIV knowledge. Patients with low HIV knowledge were more likely to know a TB patient and to have low TB knowledge. We found that stigma and low disease-specific knowledge were common among HIV-infected TB patients and associated with similar factors. Further research is needed to determine whether reducing stigma and increasing TB and HIV knowledge among the general community and patients reduces diagnostic delay and improves patient outcomes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 168 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 25%
Researcher 29 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 33 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 17%
Social Sciences 19 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Arts and Humanities 4 2%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 39 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,875
of 194,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,255
of 110,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#243
of 501 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 501 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.