↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Assessment of Substrates and Activity Based Probes as Tools for Non-Invasive Optical Imaging of Cysteine Protease Activity

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative Assessment of Substrates and Activity Based Probes as Tools for Non-Invasive Optical Imaging of Cysteine Protease Activity
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0006374
Pubmed ID
Authors

Galia Blum, Robby M. Weimer, Laura E. Edgington, Walter Adams, Matthew Bogyo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 107 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 26%
Researcher 23 20%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Professor 5 4%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 27%
Chemistry 27 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 16 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,428,992
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,309
of 193,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,066
of 110,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#244
of 497 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 497 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.