↓ Skip to main content

Larval Connectivity in an Effective Network of Marine Protected Areas

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
211 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
568 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Larval Connectivity in an Effective Network of Marine Protected Areas
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0015715
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark R. Christie, Brian N. Tissot, Mark A. Albins, James P. Beets, Yanli Jia, Delisse M. Ortiz, Stephen E. Thompson, Mark A. Hixon

Abstract

Acceptance of marine protected areas (MPAs) as fishery and conservation tools has been hampered by lack of direct evidence that MPAs successfully seed unprotected areas with larvae of targeted species. For the first time, we present direct evidence of large-scale population connectivity within an existing and effective network of MPAs. A new parentage analysis identified four parent-offspring pairs from a large, exploited population of the coral-reef fish Zebrasoma flavescens in Hawai'i, revealing larval dispersal distances ranging from 15 to 184 km. In two cases, successful dispersal was from an MPA to unprotected sites. Given high adult abundances, the documentation of any parent-offspring pairs demonstrates that ecologically-relevant larval connectivity between reefs is substantial. All offspring settled at sites to the north of where they were spawned. Satellite altimetry and oceanographic models from relevant time periods indicated a cyclonic eddy that created prevailing northward currents between sites where parents and offspring were found. These findings empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of MPAs as useful conservation and management tools and further highlight the importance of coupling oceanographic, genetic, and ecological data to predict, validate and quantify larval connectivity among marine populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 568 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 2%
Brazil 7 1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Other 13 2%
Unknown 516 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 148 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 119 21%
Student > Master 95 17%
Student > Bachelor 49 9%
Other 26 5%
Other 89 16%
Unknown 42 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 297 52%
Environmental Science 145 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 27 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 3%
Social Sciences 7 1%
Other 16 3%
Unknown 60 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,376,414
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#18,062
of 193,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,585
of 181,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#118
of 1,082 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,082 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.