↓ Skip to main content

Polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder predict creativity

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 4,127)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
38 news outlets
blogs
17 blogs
twitter
732 tweeters
facebook
46 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
438 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder predict creativity
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, June 2015
DOI 10.1038/nn.4040
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert A Power, Stacy Steinberg, Gyda Bjornsdottir, Cornelius A Rietveld, Abdel Abdellaoui, Michel M Nivard, Magnus Johannesson, Tessel E Galesloot, Jouke J Hottenga, Gonneke Willemsen, David Cesarini, Daniel J Benjamin, Patrik K E Magnusson, Fredrik Ullén, Henning Tiemeier, Albert Hofman, Frank J A van Rooij, G Bragi Walters, Engilbert Sigurdsson, Thorgeir E Thorgeirsson, Andres Ingason, Agnar Helgason, Augustine Kong, Lambertus A Kiemeney, Philipp Koellinger, Dorret I Boomsma, Daniel Gudbjartsson, Hreinn Stefansson, Kari Stefansson

Abstract

We tested whether polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder would predict creativity. Higher scores were associated with artistic society membership or creative profession in both Icelandic (P = 5.2 × 10(-6) and 3.8 × 10(-6) for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder scores, respectively) and replication cohorts (P = 0.0021 and 0.00086). This could not be accounted for by increased relatedness between creative individuals and those with psychoses, indicating that creativity and psychosis share genetic roots.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 732 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 438 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 2%
Germany 4 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 10 2%
Unknown 397 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 108 25%
Researcher 85 19%
Student > Bachelor 52 12%
Student > Master 43 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 31 7%
Other 119 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 98 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 92 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 58 13%
Unspecified 54 12%
Neuroscience 45 10%
Other 91 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 954. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,550
of 12,408,021 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#11
of 4,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61
of 232,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#1
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,408,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.