You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimating the Capacity for ART Provision in Tanzania with the Use of Data on Staff Productivity and Patient Losses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0005294 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefan Hanson, Anna Thorson, Hans Rosling, Claes Örtendahl, Claudia Hanson, Japhet Killewo, Anna Mia Ekström |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 36% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 23% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,727,332
of 23,495,502 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#94,832
of 201,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,298
of 94,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#281
of 518 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,495,502 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 518 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.