↓ Skip to main content

Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Barmah Forest Virus Disease in Queensland, Australia

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Barmah Forest Virus Disease in Queensland, Australia
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0025688
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suchithra Naish, Wenbiao Hu, Kerrie Mengersen, Shilu Tong

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 68 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Professor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 16 23%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 24%
Environmental Science 7 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 18 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,875
of 194,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,041
of 136,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,044
of 2,571 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,571 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.