↓ Skip to main content

A Worldwide Phylogeography for the Human X Chromosome

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Worldwide Phylogeography for the Human X Chromosome
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2007
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0000557
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simone S. Santos-Lopes, Rinaldo W. Pereira, Ian J. Wilson, Sérgio D.J. Pena

Abstract

We reasoned that by identifying genetic markers on human X chromosome regions where recombination is rare or absent, we should be able to construct X chromosome genealogies analogous to those based on Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms, with the advantage of providing information about both male and female components of the population.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 7%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Australia 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 62 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Professor 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 10%
Other 18 25%
Unknown 3 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 67%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 10%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 2 3%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2007.
All research outputs
#5,677,789
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#68,677
of 193,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,156
of 68,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#98
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.