↓ Skip to main content

Restoration genetics of the vernal pool endemic Lasthenia conjugens (Asteraceae)

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Genetics, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Restoration genetics of the vernal pool endemic Lasthenia conjugens (Asteraceae)
Published in
Conservation Genetics, March 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10592-005-9052-2
Authors

Jennifer M. Ramp, Sharon K. Collinge, Tom A. Ranker

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Guatemala 1 2%
Peru 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 55 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Master 7 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 57%
Environmental Science 10 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2006.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#464
of 1,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,570
of 67,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.