↓ Skip to main content

Neural Coding of Natural Stimuli: Information at Sub-Millisecond Resolution

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neural Coding of Natural Stimuli: Information at Sub-Millisecond Resolution
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, March 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000025
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilya Nemenman, Geoffrey D. Lewen, William Bialek, Rob R. de Ruyter van Steveninck

Abstract

Sensory information about the outside world is encoded by neurons in sequences of discrete, identical pulses termed action potentials or spikes. There is persistent controversy about the extent to which the precise timing of these spikes is relevant to the function of the brain. We revisit this issue, using the motion-sensitive neurons of the fly visual system as a test case. Our experimental methods allow us to deliver more nearly natural visual stimuli, comparable to those which flies encounter in free, acrobatic flight. New mathematical methods allow us to draw more reliable conclusions about the information content of neural responses even when the set of possible responses is very large. We find that significant amounts of visual information are represented by details of the spike train at millisecond and sub-millisecond precision, even though the sensory input has a correlation time of approximately 55 ms; different patterns of spike timing represent distinct motion trajectories, and the absolute timing of spikes points to particular features of these trajectories with high precision. Finally, the efficiency of our entropy estimator makes it possible to uncover features of neural coding relevant for natural visual stimuli: first, the system's information transmission rate varies with natural fluctuations in light intensity, resulting from varying cloud cover, such that marginal increases in information rate thus occur even when the individual photoreceptors are counting on the order of one million photons per second. Secondly, we see that the system exploits the relatively slow dynamics of the stimulus to remove coding redundancy and so generate a more efficient neural code.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 4%
Germany 6 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
France 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Israel 2 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 217 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 74 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 27%
Student > Master 21 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 6%
Professor 14 5%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 22 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 32%
Neuroscience 45 18%
Physics and Astronomy 27 11%
Engineering 22 9%
Computer Science 20 8%
Other 30 12%
Unknown 30 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,652,172
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#1,417
of 8,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,090
of 94,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#7
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.