↓ Skip to main content

Tramadol for neuropathic pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tramadol for neuropathic pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003726.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hollingshead J, Dühmke RM, Cornblath DR, Duehmke, Rudolf Martin, Hollingshead, James, Cornblath, David R

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 126 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Other 12 9%
Other 35 27%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 21 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2016.
All research outputs
#2,896,968
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,176
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,367
of 232,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#126
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.