You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Erratum: Corrigendum: Size and frequency of natural forest disturbances and the Amazon forest carbon balance
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Communications, April 2015
|
DOI | 10.1038/ncomms7638 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fernando D.B. Espírito-Santo, Manuel Gloor, Michael Keller, Yadvinder Malhi, Sassan Saatchi, Bruce Nelson, Raimundo C. Oliveira Junior, Cleuton Pereira, Jon Lloyd, Steve Frolking, Michael Palace, Yosio E. Shimabukuro, Valdete Duarte, Abel Monteagudo Mendoza, Gabriela López-González, Tim R. Baker, Ted R. Feldpausch, Roel J.W. Brienen, Gregory P. Asner, Doreen S. Boyd, Oliver L. Phillips |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Colombia | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 50% |
Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 4 | 16% |
Researcher | 4 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 16% |
Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 12 | 48% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 8% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2015.
All research outputs
#6,688,680
of 25,351,219 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#40,114
of 56,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,257
of 270,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#484
of 795 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,351,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 56,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 795 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.