↓ Skip to main content

Erratum: Corrigendum: Size and frequency of natural forest disturbances and the Amazon forest carbon balance

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum: Corrigendum: Size and frequency of natural forest disturbances and the Amazon forest carbon balance
Published in
Nature Communications, April 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms7638
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando D.B. Espírito-Santo, Manuel Gloor, Michael Keller, Yadvinder Malhi, Sassan Saatchi, Bruce Nelson, Raimundo C. Oliveira Junior, Cleuton Pereira, Jon Lloyd, Steve Frolking, Michael Palace, Yosio E. Shimabukuro, Valdete Duarte, Abel Monteagudo Mendoza, Gabriela López-González, Tim R. Baker, Ted R. Feldpausch, Roel J.W. Brienen, Gregory P. Asner, Doreen S. Boyd, Oliver L. Phillips

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 18%
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Other 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 9%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2015.
All research outputs
#3,290,736
of 16,606,190 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#21,352
of 32,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,919
of 238,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#383
of 645 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,606,190 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 645 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.