↓ Skip to main content

Erratum: Corrigendum: Size and frequency of natural forest disturbances and the Amazon forest carbon balance

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum: Corrigendum: Size and frequency of natural forest disturbances and the Amazon forest carbon balance
Published in
Nature Communications, April 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms7638
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando D.B. Espírito-Santo, Manuel Gloor, Michael Keller, Yadvinder Malhi, Sassan Saatchi, Bruce Nelson, Raimundo C. Oliveira Junior, Cleuton Pereira, Jon Lloyd, Steve Frolking, Michael Palace, Yosio E. Shimabukuro, Valdete Duarte, Abel Monteagudo Mendoza, Gabriela López-González, Tim R. Baker, Ted R. Feldpausch, Roel J.W. Brienen, Gregory P. Asner, Doreen S. Boyd, Oliver L. Phillips

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 21%
Researcher 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 9 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 11%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2015.
All research outputs
#2,865,832
of 15,422,952 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#18,715
of 29,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,303
of 237,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#366
of 622 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,422,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 48.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 622 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.