↓ Skip to main content

BindN+ for accurate prediction of DNA and RNA-binding residues from protein sequence features

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
BindN+ for accurate prediction of DNA and RNA-binding residues from protein sequence features
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, May 2010
DOI 10.1186/1752-0509-4-s1-s3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liangjiang Wang, Caiyan Huang, Mary Qu Yang, Jack Y Yang

Abstract

Understanding how biomolecules interact is a major task of systems biology. To model protein-nucleic acid interactions, it is important to identify the DNA or RNA-binding residues in proteins. Protein sequence features, including the biochemical property of amino acids and evolutionary information in terms of position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM), have been used for DNA or RNA-binding site prediction. However, PSSM is rather designed for PSI-BLAST searches, and it may not contain all the evolutionary information for modelling DNA or RNA-binding sites in protein sequences. In the present study, several new descriptors of evolutionary information have been developed and evaluated for sequence-based prediction of DNA and RNA-binding residues using support vector machines (SVMs). The new descriptors were shown to improve classifier performance. Interestingly, the best classifiers were obtained by combining the new descriptors and PSSM, suggesting that they captured different aspects of evolutionary information for DNA and RNA-binding site prediction. The SVM classifiers achieved 77.3% sensitivity and 79.3% specificity for prediction of DNA-binding residues, and 71.6% sensitivity and 78.7% specificity for RNA-binding site prediction. Predictions at this level of accuracy may provide useful information for modelling protein-nucleic acid interactions in systems biology studies. We have thus developed a web-based tool called BindN+ (http://bioinfo.ggc.org/bindn+/) to make the SVM classifiers accessible to the research community.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 3%
France 1 1%
Israel 1 1%
India 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 90 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 27%
Student > Master 15 15%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 16%
Computer Science 15 15%
Engineering 4 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 20 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#314
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,939
of 95,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.