You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Defective amplification of the late phase insulin response to glucose by GIP in obese Type II diabetic patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Diabetologia, July 2002
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00125-002-0878-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
T. Vilsbøll, T. Krarup, S. Madsbad, J. Holst |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
Denmark | 2 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Russia | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 183 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 34 | 18% |
Researcher | 30 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
Other | 9 | 5% |
Other | 29 | 15% |
Unknown | 43 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 28% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 13% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 5% |
Chemistry | 6 | 3% |
Other | 17 | 9% |
Unknown | 54 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2011.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#2,233
of 5,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,377
of 47,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.