The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What about Th1/Th2 in cutaneous leishmaniasis vaccine discovery?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, July 2005
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0100-879x2005000700001 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
A Campos-Neto |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 3 | 4% |
France | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 64 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 19% |
Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
Professor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 19% |
Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 26% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 14 | 20% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 13 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2016.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#152
of 1,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,648
of 67,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,254 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.