↓ Skip to main content

Expert Financial Advice Neurobiologically “Offloads” Financial Decision-Making under Risk

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Expert Financial Advice Neurobiologically “Offloads” Financial Decision-Making under Risk
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0004957
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan B. Engelmann, C. Monica Capra, Charles Noussair, Gregory S. Berns

Abstract

Financial advice from experts is commonly sought during times of uncertainty. While the field of neuroeconomics has made considerable progress in understanding the neurobiological basis of risky decision-making, the neural mechanisms through which external information, such as advice, is integrated during decision-making are poorly understood. In the current experiment, we investigated the neurobiological basis of the influence of expert advice on financial decisions under risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 243 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 25%
Researcher 39 15%
Student > Master 32 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 20 7%
Other 67 25%
Unknown 19 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 89 33%
Business, Management and Accounting 40 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 35 13%
Social Sciences 16 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 6%
Other 44 16%
Unknown 28 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2019.
All research outputs
#856,389
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#11,783
of 193,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,100
of 92,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#38
of 503 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 503 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.