You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evolution of Genome Size and Complexity in Pinus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0004332 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alison M. Morse, Daniel G. Peterson, M. Nurul Islam-Faridi, Katherine E. Smith, Zenaida Magbanua, Saul A. Garcia, Thomas L. Kubisiak, Henry V. Amerson, John E. Carlson, C. Dana Nelson, John M. Davis |
| Abstract |
Genome evolution in the gymnosperm lineage of seed plants has given rise to many of the most complex and largest plant genomes, however the elements involved are poorly understood. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 4% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Czechia | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 187 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 64 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 8% |
| Professor | 13 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 17% |
| Unknown | 28 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 135 | 62% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | <1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2013.
All research outputs
#4,422,276
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#53,966
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,388
of 192,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#168
of 550 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 550 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.