↓ Skip to main content

Hydrogen damage of steels: A case study and hydrogen embrittlement model

Overview of attention for article published in Engineering Failure Analysis, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
63 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hydrogen damage of steels: A case study and hydrogen embrittlement model
Published in
Engineering Failure Analysis, June 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.05.017
Authors

M B Djukic, Sijacki V Zeravcic, G M Bakic, A Sedmak, B Rajicic, M. B. Djukic, M.B. Djukic, V. Sijacki Zeravcic, G.M. Bakic, A. Sedmak, B. Rajicic, G. M. Bakic, Milos Djukic

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Brazil 2 4%
Russian Federation 1 2%
Serbia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 45 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 19%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 21 40%
Materials Science 20 38%
Unspecified 5 9%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 3 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2018.
All research outputs
#187,158
of 8,937,971 outputs
Outputs from Engineering Failure Analysis
#1
of 77 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,878
of 224,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Engineering Failure Analysis
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,937,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them