↓ Skip to main content

Hydrogen damage of steels: A case study and hydrogen embrittlement model

Overview of attention for article published in Engineering Failure Analysis, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
66 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hydrogen damage of steels: A case study and hydrogen embrittlement model
Published in
Engineering Failure Analysis, June 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.05.017
Authors

M B Djukic, Sijacki V Zeravcic, G M Bakic, A Sedmak, B Rajicic, M. B. Djukic, M.B. Djukic, V. Sijacki Zeravcic, G.M. Bakic, A. Sedmak, B. Rajicic, G. M. Bakic, Milos Djukic

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Brazil 2 3%
Russian Federation 1 2%
Serbia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 54 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 12 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 25 40%
Engineering 23 37%
Unspecified 7 11%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 3 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2018.
All research outputs
#196,894
of 9,721,926 outputs
Outputs from Engineering Failure Analysis
#1
of 99 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,727
of 227,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Engineering Failure Analysis
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,721,926 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them