↓ Skip to main content

Hydrogen damage of steels: A case study and hydrogen embrittlement model

Overview of attention for article published in Engineering Failure Analysis, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
53 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hydrogen damage of steels: A case study and hydrogen embrittlement model
Published in
Engineering Failure Analysis, June 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.05.017
Authors

M B Djukic, Sijacki V Zeravcic, G M Bakic, A Sedmak, B Rajicic, M. B. Djukic, M.B. Djukic, V. Sijacki Zeravcic, G.M. Bakic, A. Sedmak, B. Rajicic, G. M. Bakic, Milos Djukic

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Brazil 2 4%
Russian Federation 1 2%
Serbia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 39 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 23%
Student > Master 10 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 19%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 19 40%
Materials Science 16 34%
Unspecified 5 11%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 3 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2017.
All research outputs
#196,388
of 8,422,442 outputs
Outputs from Engineering Failure Analysis
#1
of 73 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,930
of 223,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Engineering Failure Analysis
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,422,442 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 73 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them