You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Endogenous Human Brain Dynamics Recover Slowly Following Cognitive Effort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0006626 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Barnes, Edward T. Bullmore, John Suckling |
| Abstract |
In functional magnetic resonance imaging, the brain's response to experimental manipulation is almost always assumed to be independent of endogenous oscillations. To test this, we addressed the possible interaction between cognitive task performance and endogenous fMRI oscillations in an experiment designed to answer two questions: 1) Does performance of a cognitively effortful task significantly change fractal scaling properties of fMRI time series compared to their values before task performance? 2) If so, can we relate the extent of task-related perturbation to the difficulty of the task? |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 60 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 21% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 19 | 10% |
| Professor | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 29 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 48 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 29 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 14% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,870,006
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#24,152
of 193,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,475
of 111,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#78
of 506 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 506 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.