↓ Skip to main content

Multiple threats, or multiplying the threats? Interactions between invasive predators and other ecological disturbances

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 5,987)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
32 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
70 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
156 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
360 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multiple threats, or multiplying the threats? Interactions between invasive predators and other ecological disturbances
Published in
Biological Conservation, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.05.013
Authors

Tim S. Doherty, Chris R. Dickman, Dale G. Nimmo, Euan G. Ritchie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 6 2%
United States 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 340 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 20%
Student > Master 65 18%
Researcher 51 14%
Student > Bachelor 47 13%
Other 18 5%
Other 47 13%
Unknown 59 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 154 43%
Environmental Science 100 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 1%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 72 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 320. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2022.
All research outputs
#84,763
of 22,545,203 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#47
of 5,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,096
of 267,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#1
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,545,203 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.