↓ Skip to main content

Multiple threats, or multiplying the threats? Interactions between invasive predators and other ecological disturbances

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 4,238)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
25 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
88 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
Title
Multiple threats, or multiplying the threats? Interactions between invasive predators and other ecological disturbances
Published in
Biological Conservation, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.05.013
Authors

Tim S. Doherty, Chris R. Dickman, Dale G. Nimmo, Euan G. Ritchie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 6 2%
Spain 3 1%
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 222 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 24%
Student > Master 46 19%
Researcher 42 17%
Student > Bachelor 30 12%
Other 14 6%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 24 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 117 48%
Environmental Science 75 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 2%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 32 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 272. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2020.
All research outputs
#49,305
of 14,259,275 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#24
of 4,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#923
of 236,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#1
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,259,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.