You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Surface Modification and Planar Defects of Calcium Carbonates by Magnetic Water Treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Discover Nano, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11671-010-9736-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
CZ Liu, CH Lin, MS Yeh, YM Chao, P Shen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 35% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 35% |
| Engineering | 4 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Discover Nano
#227
of 1,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,114
of 104,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discover Nano
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.