You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Perils of Ignoring History: Big Tobacco Played Dirty and Millions Died. How Similar Is Big Food?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Milbank Quarterly, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00555.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
KELLY D. BROWNELL, KENNETH E. WARNER |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 369 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 48 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 46 | 12% |
| Colombia | 17 | 5% |
| Canada | 14 | 4% |
| Australia | 11 | 3% |
| Mexico | 11 | 3% |
| Japan | 10 | 3% |
| Spain | 8 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 32 | 9% |
| Unknown | 169 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 292 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 38 | 10% |
| Scientists | 28 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 613 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 1% |
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 586 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 116 | 19% |
| Researcher | 87 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 85 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 74 | 12% |
| Other | 29 | 5% |
| Other | 111 | 18% |
| Unknown | 111 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 131 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 17% |
| Psychology | 45 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 6% |
| Other | 111 | 18% |
| Unknown | 143 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1069. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.
All research outputs
#14,860
of 25,845,895 outputs
Outputs from Milbank Quarterly
#2
of 1,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14
of 110,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Milbank Quarterly
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,178 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.