You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Minimum viable population size: not magic, but necessary
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tree.2011.09.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barry W. Brook, Corey J.A. Bradshaw, Lochran W. Traill, Richard Frankham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 6 | 3% |
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| Australia | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 173 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 60 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 17% |
| Professor | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 122 | 59% |
| Environmental Science | 50 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | <1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2016.
All research outputs
#2,237,448
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#1,203
of 3,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,160
of 148,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#13
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.