↓ Skip to main content

Understanding and Resolving Failures in Human-Robot Interaction: Literature Review and Model Development

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
337 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding and Resolving Failures in Human-Robot Interaction: Literature Review and Model Development
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00861
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shanee Honig, Tal Oron-Gilad

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 337 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 20%
Student > Master 51 15%
Student > Bachelor 28 8%
Researcher 26 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 32 9%
Unknown 118 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 59 18%
Engineering 52 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 36 11%
Psychology 26 8%
Social Sciences 16 5%
Other 29 9%
Unknown 119 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,800,583
of 25,913,612 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#5,532
of 34,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,332
of 343,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#157
of 676 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,913,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 676 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.