You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Knowledge Authoring Tool for Clinical Decision Support
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, May 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10877-008-9124-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dustin Dunsmuir, Jeremy Daniels, Christopher Brouse, Simon Ford, J. Mark Ansermino |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 6 | 7% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 21% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 28% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 17% |
| Engineering | 9 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,557,454
of 23,052,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#208
of 701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,865
of 79,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,052,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them