You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Low-value approvals and high prices might incentivize ineffective drug development
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41571-018-0030-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vinay Prasad, Christopher McCabe, Sham Mailankody |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 240 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 66 | 28% |
| Canada | 13 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 9 | 4% |
| Spain | 8 | 3% |
| France | 8 | 3% |
| Sweden | 3 | 1% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Unknown | 96 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 157 | 65% |
| Scientists | 51 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 25 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 18 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 11% |
| Philosophy | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 174. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2023.
All research outputs
#236,395
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
#31
of 2,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,182
of 342,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
#3
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.