↓ Skip to main content

Antigen-specific Tregs control T cell responses against a limited repertoire of tumor antigens in patients with colorectal carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Investigation, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
180 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antigen-specific Tregs control T cell responses against a limited repertoire of tumor antigens in patients with colorectal carcinoma
Published in
Journal of Clinical Investigation, October 2009
DOI 10.1172/jci39608
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Bonertz, Jürgen Weitz, Dong-Ho Kim Pietsch, Nuh N. Rahbari, Christoph Schlude, Yingzi Ge, Simone Juenger, Israel Vlodavsky, Khashayarsha Khazaie, Dirk Jaeger, Christoph Reissfelder, Dalibor Antolovic, Maximilian Aigner, Moritz Koch, Philipp Beckhove

Abstract

Spontaneous antitumor T cell responses in cancer patients are strongly controlled by Tregs, and increased numbers of tumor-infiltrating Tregs correlate with reduced survival. However, the tumor antigens recognized by Tregs in cancer patients and the impact of these cells on tumor-specific T cell responses have not been systematically characterized. Here we used a broad panel of long synthetic peptides of defined tumor antigens and normal tissue antigens to exploit a newly developed method to identify and compare ex vivo the antigen specificities of Tregs with those of effector/memory T cells in peripheral blood of colorectal cancer patients and healthy subjects. Tregs in tumor patients were highly specific for a distinct set of only a few tumor antigens, suggesting that Tregs exert T cell suppression in an antigen-selective manner. Tumor-specific effector T cells were detectable in the majority of colorectal cancer patients but not in healthy individuals. We detected differences in the repertoires of antigens recognized by Tregs and effector/memory T cells in the majority of colorectal cancer patients. In addition, only effector/memory T cell responses against antigens recognized by Tregs strongly increased after Treg depletion. The selection of antigens according to preexisting T cell responses may improve the efficacy of future immunotherapies for cancer and autoimmune disease.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 151 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 28%
Researcher 37 24%
Student > Master 16 10%
Other 9 6%
Professor 8 5%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 20 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 26 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 21 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2009.
All research outputs
#6,525,286
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#8,783
of 17,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,002
of 106,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#38
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.