↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying the Extent of North American Mammal Extinction Relative to the Pre-Anthropogenic Baseline

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantifying the Extent of North American Mammal Extinction Relative to the Pre-Anthropogenic Baseline
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0008331
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc A. Carrasco, Anthony D. Barnosky, Russell W. Graham

Abstract

Earth has experienced five major extinction events in the past 450 million years. Many scientists suggest we are now witnessing a sixth, driven by human impacts. However, it has been difficult to quantify the real extent of the current extinction episode, either for a given taxonomic group at the continental scale or for the worldwide biota, largely because comparisons of pre-anthropogenic and anthropogenic biodiversity baselines have been unavailable. Here, we compute those baselines for mammals of temperate North America, using a sampling-standardized rich fossil record to reconstruct species-area relationships for a series of time slices ranging from 30 million to 500 years ago. We show that shortly after humans first arrived in North America, mammalian diversity dropped to become at least 15%-42% too low compared to the "normal" diversity baseline that had existed for millions of years. While the Holocene reduction in North American mammal diversity has long been recognized qualitatively, our results provide a quantitative measure that clarifies how significant the diversity reduction actually was. If mass extinctions are defined as loss of at least 75% of species on a global scale, our data suggest that North American mammals had already progressed one-fifth to more than halfway (depending on biogeographic province) towards that benchmark, even before industrialized society began to affect them. Data currently are not available to make similar quantitative estimates for other continents, but qualitative declines in Holocene mammal diversity are also widely recognized in South America, Eurasia, and Australia. Extending our methodology to mammals in these areas, as well as to other taxa where possible, would provide a reasonable way to assess the magnitude of global extinction, the biodiversity impact of extinctions of currently threatened species, and the efficacy of conservation efforts into the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 7%
Brazil 4 2%
Canada 2 1%
Argentina 2 1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 162 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 25%
Researcher 32 17%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Student > Master 20 11%
Other 13 7%
Other 40 21%
Unknown 13 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 43%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 33 17%
Environmental Science 31 16%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Arts and Humanities 5 3%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 15 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,044,363
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#14,092
of 193,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,279
of 163,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#50
of 591 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 591 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.