↓ Skip to main content

Reliability of Quantitative Real-Time PCR for Bacterial Detection in Cystic Fibrosis Airway Specimens

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reliability of Quantitative Real-Time PCR for Bacterial Detection in Cystic Fibrosis Airway Specimens
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0015101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edith T. Zemanick, Brandie D. Wagner, Scott D. Sagel, Mark J. Stevens, Frank J. Accurso, J. Kirk Harris

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Germany 2 1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Unknown 175 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 21%
Researcher 32 17%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Other 13 7%
Other 45 24%
Unknown 22 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 27 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2013.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#116,700
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,149
of 194,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#527
of 1,015 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,015 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.