↓ Skip to main content

Relationship of Bode Index to Functional Tests in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relationship of Bode Index to Functional Tests in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Published in
Clinics, October 2009
DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322009001000008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eloisa Maria Gatti Regueiro, Valéria Amorim Pires Di Lorenzo, Renata Pedrolongo Basso, Bruna Varanda Pessoa, Mauricio Jamami, Dirceu Costa

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Unknown 92 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 17%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 8 9%
Other 27 29%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 24%
Sports and Recreations 8 9%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 21 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#327
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,599
of 106,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.