You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cooperation between Engulfment Receptors: The Case of ABCA1 and MEGF10
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0000120 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yannick Hamon, Doriane Trompier, Zhong Ma, Victor Venegas, Matthieu Pophillat, Vincent Mignotte, Zheng Zhou, Giovanna Chimini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 30% |
| Researcher | 15 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 4 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 4 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,216,867
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#85,668
of 194,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,180
of 156,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#106
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.