↓ Skip to main content

Behavioral Neuroscience of Learning and Memory

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 454: Exploration of the Neurobiological Basis for a Three-System, Multiattribute Model of Memory.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Exploration of the Neurobiological Basis for a Three-System, Multiattribute Model of Memory.
Chapter number 454
Book title
Behavioral Neuroscience of Learning and Memory
Published in
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/7854_2016_454
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-978755-8, 978-3-31-978757-2
Authors

Raymond P. Kesner, Kesner, Raymond P, Kesner, Raymond P.

Abstract

The structure and utilization of memory is central to one's knowledge of the past, interpretation of the present, and prediction of the future. Therefore, the understanding of the structural and process components of memory systems at the psychological and neurobiological level is of paramount importance. There have been a number of attempts to divide learning and memory into multiple memory systems. Schacter and Tulving, Memory systems 1994. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994) have suggested that one needs to define memory systems in terms of the kind of information to be represented, the processes associated with the operation of each system, and the neurobiological substrates, including neural structures and mechanisms, that subserve each system. Furthermore, it is likely that within each system there are multiple forms or subsystems associated with each memory system and there are likely to be multiple processes that define the operation of each system. Finally, there are probably multiple neural structures that form the overall substrate of a memory system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Student > Postgraduate 2 17%
Professor 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 5 42%
Psychology 2 17%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2016.
All research outputs
#19,015,492
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#404
of 499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,141
of 396,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#61
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.