You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of the INS-1 832/13 Cell Line as a Beta-Cell Based Screening System to Assess Pollutant Effects on Beta-Cell Function
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0060030 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tine L. M. Hectors, Caroline Vanparys, Anna Pereira-Fernandes, Geert A. Martens, Ronny Blust |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 64 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 18% |
Student > Master | 12 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 15% |
Unknown | 16 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 19% |
Unknown | 17 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,557,593
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#90,636
of 196,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,175
of 198,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,135
of 5,437 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,586 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,437 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.