↓ Skip to main content

Heart Failure: From Research to Clinical Practice

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Heart Failure: From Research to Clinical Practice'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 99 The Evolution of mHealth Solutions for Heart Failure Management
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 105 Pathogenesis, Clinical Features and Treatment of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 106 New Insights in Cardiac Calcium Handling and Excitation-Contraction Coupling
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 112 Combination of Hydralazine and Isosorbide-Dinitrate in the Treatment of Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 115 Palliative Care in the Management of Patients with Advanced Heart Failure
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 120 The Role of Cardiologists in the Management of Patients with Heart Failure
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 126 Heart Failure and Kidney Disease
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 132 Dysthyroidism and Chronic Heart Failure: Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 135 Critical Appraisal of Multivariable Prognostic Scores in Heart Failure: Development, Validation and Clinical Utility
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 136 Management of Bradyarrhythmias in Heart Failure: A Tailored Approach
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 137 Optimizing Management of Heart Failure by Using Echo and Natriuretic Peptides in the Outpatient Unit
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 140 Circulating Biomarkers in Heart Failure
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 142 Percutaneous Mitral Valve Interventions and Heart Failure
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 143 Evolving Role of Natriuretic Peptides from Diagnostic Tool to Therapeutic Modality
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 144 Physical Training and Cardiac Rehabilitation in Heart Failure Patients
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 145 Left Ventricular Assist Devices – A State of the Art Review
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 146 Central Sleep Apnea with Cheyne-Stokes Breathing in Heart Failure – From Research to Clinical Practice and Beyond
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 149 Treatment of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 176 Athlete’s Heart and Left Heart Disease
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 178 Transition of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Heart Failure
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 179 Combination Therapy of Renin Angiotensin System Inhibitors and β-Blockers in Patients with Heart Failure
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 181 Heart Failure: From Research to Clinical Practice
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 182 The Art and Science of Using Diuretics in the Treatment of Heart Failure in Diverse Clinical Settings
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 183 Advanced Non-invasive Imaging Techniques in Chronic Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 198 Erratum to: Management of Bradyarrhythmias in Heart Failure: A Tailored Approach
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 204 Erratum to: Percutaneous Mitral Valve Interventions and Heart Failure
Attention for Chapter 179: Combination Therapy of Renin Angiotensin System Inhibitors and β-Blockers in Patients with Heart Failure
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Combination Therapy of Renin Angiotensin System Inhibitors and β-Blockers in Patients with Heart Failure
Chapter number 179
Book title
Heart Failure: From Research to Clinical Practice
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/5584_2018_179
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-978279-9, 978-3-31-978280-5
Authors

Kotaro Nochioka, Yasuhiko Sakata, Hiroaki Shimokawa, Nochioka, Kotaro, Sakata, Yasuhiko, Shimokawa, Hiroaki

Abstract

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and sympathetic nervous system play crucial roles in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Clinical trials provide strong evidence of prognostic benefits for combination therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and β-blocker in the treatment of HFrEF. Angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) is not superior to ACEI in improving mortality and an alternative for patients who are intolerant to ACEI. Prognostic evidence for triple therapy which combined angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and ACEI in addition to β-blocker therapy, is still controversial in HFrEF. Moreover, a recent clinical trial showed that triple therapy did not provide additional benefit compared with ACEI or ARB therapy alone in mildly symptomatic HFrEF. Of note, the triple therapy can even cause harm and renal dysfunction in HF with a history of hypertension. Direct renin inhibitor (DRI) has the theoretical benefit of upstream RAAS inhibition at the point of pathway activation. However, the results from clinical trials do not support upstream renin inhibition by DRI in addition to standard therapy with ACEI in patients with HFrEF. Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) which combines a neprilysin inhibitor and ARB valsartan have a unique mode of action targeting both RAAS and the natriuretic peptide systems. In contrast to the evidence in HFrEF, clinical value of combination therapy with RAAS inhibitors and β-blocker is not well established in HF with preserved EF (HFpEF). The heterogeneity of diagnostic criteria and baseline characteristics of HFpEF need further evidence for the combination therapy. However, a recent clinical trial of LCZ696 showed promising results in reducing NT-proBNP in patients with HFpEF.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 10 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 47%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Unknown 12 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2018.
All research outputs
#15,495,840
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,517
of 4,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,816
of 442,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#111
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.