You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Metatranscriptomics and Pyrosequencing Facilitate Discovery of Potential Viral Natural Enemies of the Invasive Caribbean Crazy Ant, Nylanderia pubens
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0031828 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Steven M. Valles, David H. Oi, Fahong Yu, Xin-Xing Tan, Eileen A. Buss |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 3 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 70 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 25% |
Researcher | 13 | 17% |
Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 9% |
Other | 16 | 21% |
Unknown | 7 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 60% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 16% |
Engineering | 3 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2015.
All research outputs
#7,557,690
of 23,053,613 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#90,633
of 196,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,728
of 156,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,325
of 3,496 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,613 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,591 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,496 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.