↓ Skip to main content

Transmission Selects for HIV-1 Strains of Intermediate Virulence: A Modelling Approach

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transmission Selects for HIV-1 Strains of Intermediate Virulence: A Modelling Approach
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002185
Pubmed ID
Authors

George Shirreff, Lorenzo Pellis, Oliver Laeyendecker, Christophe Fraser

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 56 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Professor 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Mathematics 4 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 12 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,975,082
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,302
of 8,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,624
of 148,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#49
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.