↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Prognostic Value of RNA Viral Load and CD4 Cell Counts during Untreated HIV-1 Infection—A Quantitative Review

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical Prognostic Value of RNA Viral Load and CD4 Cell Counts during Untreated HIV-1 Infection—A Quantitative Review
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0005950
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eline L. Korenromp, Brian G. Williams, George P. Schmid, Christopher Dye

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Zimbabwe 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 94 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 20%
Researcher 18 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Professor 6 6%
Other 23 23%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 14 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2013.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,877
of 194,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,407
of 110,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#263
of 521 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 521 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.