You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Potential Impact of Antiretroviral Therapy and Screening on Cervical Cancer Mortality in HIV-Positive Women in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Simulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0018527 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julius Atashili, Jennifer S. Smith, Adaora A. Adimora, Joseph Eron, William C. Miller, Evan Myers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 17% |
| Researcher | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 20% |
| Unknown | 22 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2015.
All research outputs
#17,761,927
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#147,307
of 194,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,600
of 109,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,220
of 1,444 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,444 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.