↓ Skip to main content

Protective Effect of Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells in an Immunodeficient Mouse Model of Acute Tubular Necrosis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protective Effect of Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells in an Immunodeficient Mouse Model of Acute Tubular Necrosis
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0009357
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Perin, Sargis Sedrakyan, Stefano Giuliani, Stefano Da Sacco, Gianni Carraro, Liron Shiri, Kevin V. Lemley, Michael Rosol, Sam Wu, Anthony Atala, David Warburton, Roger E. De Filippo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Master 7 12%
Professor 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 16%
Engineering 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,665,375
of 24,081,774 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#33,490
of 206,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,123
of 96,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#147
of 673 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,081,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 673 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.