↓ Skip to main content

Differential Entropy Preserves Variational Information of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Time Series Associated With Working Memory

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential Entropy Preserves Variational Information of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Time Series Associated With Working Memory
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fninf.2018.00033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Soheil Keshmiri, Hidenubo Sumioka, Ryuji Yamazaki, Hiroshi Ishiguro

Abstract

Neuroscience research shows a growing interest in the application of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) in analysis and decoding of the brain activity of human subjects. Given the correlation that is observed between the Blood Oxygen Dependent Level (BOLD) responses that are exhibited by the time series data of functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and the hemoglobin oxy/deoxy-genation that is captured by NIRS, linear models play a central role in these applications. This, in turn, results in adaptation of the feature extraction strategies that are well-suited for discretization of data that exhibit a high degree of linearity, namely, slope and the mean as well as their combination, to summarize the informational contents of the NIRS time series. In this article, we demonstrate that these features are inefficient in capturing the variational information of NIRS data, limiting the reliability and the adequacy of the conclusion on their results. Alternatively, we propose the linear estimate of differential entropy of these time series as a natural representation of such information. We provide evidence for our claim through comparative analysis of the application of these features on NIRS data pertinent to several working memory tasks as well as naturalistic conversational stimuli.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Researcher 5 14%
Professor 4 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 7 19%
Engineering 6 17%
Psychology 3 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 13 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,512,676
of 23,054,359 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#557
of 755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,706
of 329,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#17
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,054,359 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.