↓ Skip to main content

An in vivo biosensor for neurotransmitter release and in situ receptor activity

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
28 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
312 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An in vivo biosensor for neurotransmitter release and in situ receptor activity
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, December 2009
DOI 10.1038/nn.2469
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quoc-Thang Nguyen, Lee F Schroeder, Marco Mank, Arnaud Muller, Palmer Taylor, Oliver Griesbeck, David Kleinfeld

Abstract

Tools from molecular biology, combined with in vivo optical imaging techniques, provide new mechanisms for noninvasively observing brain processes. Current approaches primarily probe cell-based variables, such as cytosolic calcium or membrane potential, but not cell-to-cell signaling. We devised cell-based neurotransmitter fluorescent engineered reporters (CNiFERs) to address this challenge and monitor in situ neurotransmitter receptor activation. CNiFERs are cultured cells that are engineered to express a chosen metabotropic receptor, use the G(q) protein-coupled receptor cascade to transform receptor activity into a rise in cytosolic [Ca(2+)] and report [Ca(2+)] with a genetically encoded fluorescent Ca(2+) sensor. The initial realization of CNiFERs detected acetylcholine release via activation of M1 muscarinic receptors. We used chronic implantation of M1-CNiFERs in frontal cortex of the adult rat to elucidate the muscarinic action of the atypical neuroleptics clozapine and olanzapine. We found that these drugs potently inhibited in situ muscarinic receptor activity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 4%
Germany 8 3%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Israel 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 276 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 106 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 20%
Student > Master 20 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 19 6%
Professor 17 5%
Other 59 19%
Unknown 29 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 131 42%
Neuroscience 59 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 5%
Chemistry 14 4%
Other 32 10%
Unknown 36 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,636,432
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#2,638
of 5,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,755
of 164,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#14
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.