↓ Skip to main content

Long-term memory for concepts in a California sea lion (Zalophus californianus)

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, October 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-term memory for concepts in a California sea lion (Zalophus californianus)
Published in
Animal Cognition, October 2002
DOI 10.1007/s10071-002-0153-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colleen Reichmuth Kastak, Ronald J. Schusterman

Abstract

An adult California sea lion ( Zalophus californianus) with extensive experience in performing discrimination learning tasks was tested to evaluate her long-term memory for two previously learned concepts. An associative concept, that of equivalence classification, was retested after a retention interval of approximately 1 year. The sea lion had originally shown emergent equivalence classification with nonsimilarity-based classes of stimuli in a simple discrimination repeated-reversal procedure as well as in a matching-to-sample procedure. The 1-year memory test revealed no decrement in classification performance in either procedure. A relational concept, that of generalized identity matching, was retested after approximately 10 years. The sea lion had originally received trial-and-error exemplar training with identity matching-to-sample problems prior to transferring the concept to novel stimulus configurations. In the 10-year memory test, the sea lion immediately and reliably applied the previously established identity concept to familiar and novel sets of matching problems. These are the first reports of long-term conceptual memory in a nonprimate species. The experimental findings are consistent with a variety of observations of sea lions in natural settings, which indicate that natal sites, feeding areas, and individuals may be remembered over long periods of time.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Netherlands 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 101 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 22%
Student > Master 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 5 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 56%
Psychology 24 21%
Environmental Science 8 7%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Philosophy 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 10 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,099,692
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#573
of 1,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,098
of 50,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them