↓ Skip to main content

RAID

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RAID
Published in
ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2016
DOI 10.1145/2897824.2925939
Authors

Paul Guerrero, Niloy J. Mitra, Peter Wonka

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Hong Kong 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 35%
Student > Master 13 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Researcher 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 27 68%
Engineering 7 18%
Design 1 3%
Unknown 5 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2004.
All research outputs
#4,467,896
of 14,574,801 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#613
of 1,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,508
of 275,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,574,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.