↓ Skip to main content

GIFtS: annotation landscape analysis with GeneCards

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GIFtS: annotation landscape analysis with GeneCards
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, October 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-10-348
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arye Harel, Aron Inger, Gil Stelzer, Liora Strichman-Almashanu, Irina Dalah, Marilyn Safran, Doron Lancet

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Other 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,462,180
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,024
of 7,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,751
of 94,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#28
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.