↓ Skip to main content

Immune function in chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Immunology, January 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immune function in chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection
Published in
Journal of Clinical Immunology, January 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf00915168
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruthann Kibler, David O. Lucas, Mary Jane Hicks, Bonnie T. Poulos, James F. Jones

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 43%
Psychology 1 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 1996.
All research outputs
#7,558,247
of 23,055,429 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Immunology
#536
of 1,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,380
of 39,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Immunology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,055,429 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them