↓ Skip to main content

A Glucose BioFuel Cell Implanted in Rats

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8 X users
patent
5 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
349 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
306 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Glucose BioFuel Cell Implanted in Rats
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0010476
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philippe Cinquin, Chantal Gondran, Fabien Giroud, Simon Mazabrard, Aymeric Pellissier, François Boucher, Jean-Pierre Alcaraz, Karine Gorgy, François Lenouvel, Stéphane Mathé, Paolo Porcu, Serge Cosnier

Abstract

Powering future generations of implanted medical devices will require cumbersome transcutaneous energy transfer or harvesting energy from the human body. No functional solution that harvests power from the body is currently available, despite attempts to use the Seebeck thermoelectric effect, vibrations or body movements. Glucose fuel cells appear more promising, since they produce electrical energy from glucose and dioxygen, two substrates present in physiological fluids. The most powerful ones, Glucose BioFuel Cells (GBFCs), are based on enzymes electrically wired by redox mediators. However, GBFCs cannot be implanted in animals, mainly because the enzymes they rely on either require low pH or are inhibited by chloride or urate anions, present in the Extra Cellular Fluid (ECF). Here we present the first functional implantable GBFC, working in the retroperitoneal space of freely moving rats. The breakthrough relies on the design of a new family of GBFCs, characterized by an innovative and simple mechanical confinement of various enzymes and redox mediators: enzymes are no longer covalently bound to the surface of the electron collectors, which enables use of a wide variety of enzymes and redox mediators, augments the quantity of active enzymes, and simplifies GBFC construction. Our most efficient GBFC was based on composite graphite discs containing glucose oxidase and ubiquinone at the anode, polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and quinone at the cathode. PPO reduces dioxygen into water, at pH 7 and in the presence of chloride ions and urates at physiological concentrations. This GBFC, with electrodes of 0.133 mL, produced a peak specific power of 24.4 microW mL(-1), which is better than pacemakers' requirements and paves the way for the development of a new generation of implantable artificial organs, covering a wide range of medical applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
France 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 289 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 24%
Student > Master 45 15%
Researcher 44 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 25 8%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Other 41 13%
Unknown 55 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 66 22%
Chemistry 59 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 5%
Chemical Engineering 14 5%
Other 44 14%
Unknown 67 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2021.
All research outputs
#616,186
of 23,427,600 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#8,599
of 200,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,721
of 96,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#36
of 704 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,427,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 704 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.