↓ Skip to main content

Relaxation of muscle fibres by photolysis of caged ATP

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, December 1982
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Relaxation of muscle fibres by photolysis of caged ATP
Published in
Nature, December 1982
DOI 10.1038/300701a0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Y. E. Goldman, M. G. Hibberd, J. A. McCray, D. R. Trentham

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 40%
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 15%
Chemistry 3 15%
Physics and Astronomy 3 15%
Engineering 2 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 1995.
All research outputs
#2,787,492
of 10,355,316 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#38,959
of 55,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,430
of 99,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#287
of 311 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,355,316 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 54th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 311 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.