↓ Skip to main content

Malaria, anaemia and nutritional status among schoolchildren in relation to ecosystems, livelihoods and health systems in Kilosa District in central Tanzania

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Malaria, anaemia and nutritional status among schoolchildren in relation to ecosystems, livelihoods and health systems in Kilosa District in central Tanzania
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-1932-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonard E.G. Mboera, Veneranda M. Bwana, Susan F. Rumisha, Robert C. Malima, Malongo R.S. Mlozi, Benjamin K. Mayala, Grades Stanley, Tabitha Mlacha

Abstract

Malaria prevalence and transmission intensity in Tanzania is heterogeneous with spatial and temporal variations between geographical areas and ecological systems. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of malaria, anaemia and nutritional status in relation to livelihoods, ecosystem and health systems in Kilosa District in central Tanzania. This study was conducted in four villages, two characterised by rice irrigation ecosystem and the other two by dry savannah ecosystem and pastoral livelihoods. In each ecosystem, one of the villages had a healthcare facility. Schoolchildren were screened for malaria infection using malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT) and microscopy and they were assessed for their anaemia and nutritional statuses. A total of 1,019 school children (age = 4-16 years) were screened for malaria infection. The overall prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum infection was 10.6 % and 4.5 % by mRDT and microscopy, respectively. Children from pastoral villages had lower (2.9 %) prevalence of malaria than their counterparts (18.2 %) in the rice irrigation villages. A significantly high risk of malaria was observed among children in rice irrigation than in the pastoral ecosystem (OR: 0.13; 95%CI 0.07, 0.23). Children living in areas with health care facilities had a low odd of malaria infection by 45 % (OR: 0.55; 95 % CI = 0.35, 0.86). Overall, the prevalence of anaemia in the district was 43.4 % (n = 775); and 58.3 % of those with severe anaemia were among children from the pastoral villages. Anaemia was significantly higher among children not using mosquito nets (p = 0.049); and among those with malaria infection (p <0.001). The majority (96 %) of the children had Body Mass Index less than 18.5 kg/m(2) which indicate high proportion of underweight. There are significant variations in the risk of acquiring malaria infection between different ecosystems and livelihoods. These findings suggest that malaria control programmes must take into account ecosystems and livelihoods of the targeted population through an integrated management of malaria and nutrition approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 140 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 18%
Student > Master 24 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 36 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 11%
Social Sciences 13 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Environmental Science 7 5%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 40 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2015.
All research outputs
#20,280,315
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#13,892
of 14,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,058
of 264,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#230
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.