↓ Skip to main content

Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: Report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance Task Group No. 1

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Physics, June 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
233 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: Report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance Task Group No. 1
Published in
Medical Physics, June 1998
DOI 10.1118/1.596566
Authors

Ronald R. Price, Leon Axel, Tommie Morgan, Robert Newman, William Perman, Nicholas Schneiders, Mark Selikson, Michael Wood, Stephen R. Thomas

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Sweden 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 93 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 23%
Other 12 11%
Student > Master 11 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 5%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 8 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 38 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 20%
Engineering 15 14%
Computer Science 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 19 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2020.
All research outputs
#5,421,315
of 16,908,873 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#1,498
of 6,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,390
of 283,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#17
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,908,873 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,602 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.