↓ Skip to main content

Napoleon Bonaparte's gastric cancer: a clinicopathologic approach to staging, pathogenesis, and etiology

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Napoleon Bonaparte's gastric cancer: a clinicopathologic approach to staging, pathogenesis, and etiology
Published in
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, January 2007
DOI 10.1038/ncpgasthep0684
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro Lugli, Inti Zlobec, Gad Singer, Andrea Kopp Lugli, Luigi M Terracciano, Robert M Genta

Abstract

Numerous hypotheses on the cause of Napoleon Bonaparte's death have been proposed, including hereditary gastric cancer, arsenic poisoning, and inappropriate medical treatment. We aimed to determine the etiology and pathogenesis of Napoleon's illness by a comparison of historical information with current clinicopathologic knowledge.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 6 22%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,187,055
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology
#623
of 2,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,837
of 168,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them