↓ Skip to main content

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations: A Need for Action

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Medicine, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations: A Need for Action
Published in
American Journal of Medicine, May 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.05.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Anzueto, Marc Miravitlles

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, with exacerbations contributing strongly to the overall severity and burden of disease at the individual level. Many patients with COPD are managed predominantly in the primary care setting; therefore, primary care physicians (PCPs) must have awareness and understanding of the causes, effects, and management of exacerbations in COPD. This review offers practical information regarding how exacerbations are defined in the treatment setting, pathogenic and environmental causes, options for exacerbation treatment and prevention, and suggestions for improving care in the clinic. Exacerbations have a strong negative impact on patients and are associated with an increased risk of further exacerbations and declines in lung function. Thus, it is important that exacerbations not requiring hospitalization can be identified and confidently managed in the clinical setting. Understanding treatment options for acute exacerbations and maintenance treatment to prevent future exacerbations may help PCPs better understand what they can do within their practice to support patients. This review aims to provide useful guidance for PCPs to identify exacerbations and adjust their practice for optimal management of exacerbations in patients with COPD, and to encourage PCPs that they have an important task in integrating effective COPD management into the primary care setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 24%
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Unspecified 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 14 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Unspecified 3 6%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 20 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2018.
All research outputs
#16,075,992
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Medicine
#5,654
of 7,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,631
of 343,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Medicine
#38
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.